Camp Lejeune Water Contamination: Health Crisis And Legal Battle

According to the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), an estimated one million people may have been exposed to the contaminated water at Camp Lejeune between August 1, 1953 and December 31, 1987.

These include:

  • Active duty Marines, sailors, and Coast Guard members who trained or worked at the base
  • Civilian employees and contractors who worked at the base
  • Family members of service members and employees who lived on or near the base
  • Visitors who stayed on or near the base for at least 30 days
Common Injuries/Illness Reported:
  • Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma
  • Parkinson’s disease
  • Breast cancer
  • Esophageal cancer
  • Lung cancer
  • Neurobehavioral effects
  • Renal toxicity
  • Scleroderma
  • Miscarriages/Fertility Issues
  • Adult leukemia
  • Aplastic anemia and other myelodysplastic syndromes
  • Bladder cancer
  • Kidney cancer
  • Liver cancer
  • Multiple myeloma

    ATTENTION: GUARANTEED PAYOUTS FOR VICTIMS UP TO $550K*

    If You Were At Camp Lejeune, You Were Exposed To Contaminated Water!

    If you or a loved one were stationed, worked, or lived at Camp Lejeune between 1953 and 1987 and developed cancer or a serious illness, you may be eligible for Financial Compensation

    This lawsuit will NOT affect your eligibility for VA Disability Benefits.

    See If You Qualify For Compensation

    Get an immediate, FREE case review!

    By clicking the “SEE IF I QUALIFY” button above, you agree that you will be contacted by telephone, email SMS/Text Message (Data Rates May Apply), even if you are on a federal or state Do Not Call registry, to confirm the accuracy of the information you submit and verify if you qualify.

    If You Were A Victim Of Camp Lejeune Water Contamination, We Can Help

    Let Injury Claims match you with a qualified lawyer who can evaluate your case and help you seek justice and compensation for the harm you’ve experienced due to the contamination. If you believe you have a case, don’t hesitate to reach out to legal professionals who can guide you through the process and help you secure the best possible outcome.
    See if you qualify for compensation by filling out our simple form above and get access to an immediate and FREE case review!

    Camp Lejeune Water Contamination: Health Crisis And Legal Battle

    Camp Lejeune, a United States Marine Corps base located in North Carolina, has been the site of one of the worst drinking water contamination incidents in U.S. history. Water contamination crisis exposed military personnel, their families, and civilian employees to hazardous chemicals for decades.

    The contamination primarily stemmed from two on-base water treatment facilities, Tarawa Terrace and Hadnot Point, which supplied drinking water to the residents of the base.

    Between the 1950s and the 1980s, the water at Camp Lejeune contained a toxic mixture of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), including trichloroethylene (TCE), tetrachloroethylene (PCE), benzene, and other chemicals. These contaminants seeped into the groundwater due to improper waste disposal practices, leaking underground storage tanks, and other sources. You may be owed compensation for your pain and suffering.

    See if you qualify for compensation by filling out our simple form above and get access to an immediate and FREE case review!.

    Camp Lejeune In The Media

    News:

    Lawsuits And Legal Process

    As the health impacts of the water contamination became evident, affected individuals and families began pursuing legal action to seek justice and compensation for their suffering. Multiple lawsuits were filed against the U.S. government, alleging negligence, failure to warn, and other claims. These cases sought damages for medical expenses, pain and suffering, and loss of life quality. Lawsuits also targeted corporations responsible for the contamination and its aftermath.

    The legal process involved several key steps:

    FILING A LAWSUIT: Plaintiffs (those affected) would engage legal representation and file lawsuits against the parties responsible for the contamination.
    DISCOVERY: Both sides would gather evidence through the process of discovery, which involves exchanging documents, conducting depositions, and collecting expert opinions.
    SETTLEMENT OR TRIAL: Depending on the strength of the evidence and negotiations between parties, some cases may reach a settlement outside of court. If a settlement cannot be reached, the case will proceed to trial.
    TRIAL AND VERDICT: In a trial, evidence is presented, witnesses testify, and legal arguments are made. A judge or jury would then decide on the verdict, determining if the defendant(s) were liable and what damages, if any, should be awarded to the plaintiffs.

    Key Differences Between Mass Tort And Class Action Lawsuits

    Structure:
    Mass Tort: Involves multiple individual lawsuits grouped together due to common elements or defendants.
    Class Action Lawsuits: A single lawsuit brought on behalf of a larger group, known as the class, with a designated representative plaintiff.

    Individual Control:
    Mass Tort: Each plaintiff maintains control over their case and its resolution.
    Class Action Lawsuits: Class members have limited control over the lawsuit, with decisions made by the representative plaintiff and their legal team.

    Compensation:
    Mass Tort: Compensation and settlements are determined individually, considering the unique circumstances and harm suffered by each plaintiff.
    Class Action Lawsuits: Compensation and settlements are typically distributed uniformly among all class members, often on a pro-rata basis.

    Applicability:
    Mass Tort: Ideal when cases involve varying degrees of harm or distinct circumstances for each plaintiff.
    Class Action Lawsuits: Effective when numerous claimants have similar claims and a uniform resolution is practical.

    Efficiency:
    Mass Tort: May be more time-consuming and complex due to individual case management.
    Class Action Lawsuits: Generally more efficient in terms of time and resources as it consolidates claims into one proceeding.

    Understanding these differences is crucial for both plaintiffs and defendants when determining the most appropriate legal strategy for addressing a collective grievance or harm.

    ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT

    This website or its third-party tools use cookies, which are necessary for its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy, including the personalization and analysis of ads and content. If you want to learn more please refer to the cookie policy and privacy policy. You accept the use of cookies by scrolling this page, by clicking a link or button or by continuing to browse otherwise.

    27475 Ynez Rd #708, Temecula, CA 92591